international employment law firm alliance L&E Global
China

China: It was held by Court that Agreement on Non-Competition Obligation shall be Interpreted in Favor of the Employee

The Company and the Employee entered into an employment contract and a non-competition agreement. It was prescribed in the non-competition agreement that: (1) the employee is obligated to perform non-competition for 24 months after departure from the Company; (2) the Company shall provide monthly compensation to the Employee if non-competition is performed; (3) the non-competition obligation period only starts to count when the Company sends the Non-competition Letter to the Employee; and (4) the non-competition agreement becomes effective when duly signed. The Employee was terminated by the Company after three years of service, never received the Non-competition Letter from the Company, but still performed the non-competition obligation after termination and received no compensation from the Company. The Employee filed a lawsuit against the Company to claim payment of compensation for performance of non-competition obligation. Through the judicial process, the Court eventually ruled that the Company shall compensate the Employee for performance of non-competition. The Court came to this decision based on the followings: (a) the non-competition agreement includes conflicting provisions on effectiveness of Employee’s non-competition obligation; and (b) as the non-competition agreement is prepared by the Company, the ambiguity arising from the conflicting provisions therein shall be interpreted in favor of the Employee.

Contact

Did you like what you read?

And do you need more information about this subject or can we assist you in a legal matter?