Introduction
In Canada, the power to make laws is divided between the federal and provincial governments. Generally, for historic, constitutional reasons, provinces have jurisdiction over most employment matters, while the federal government has jurisdiction over employment only in respect of specific industries, such as airways, shipping and banks. Employment law in Canada is quite similar from province to province and is governed by both federal and provincial legislation as well as by the common law (judge-made law). Quebec is the notable exception to this rule, as Quebec operates under a civil law system based on a written “civil code” founded on France’s Napoleonic Code.
Legal framework
Canadian labour and employment law requires an understanding of the constitutional division of power between the federal government of Canada and the governments of Canada’s ten provinces and three territories. Labour and employment matters are principally within provincial and territorial jurisdiction; however, the federal government has jurisdiction over certain industries that are thought to have a national, international, or inter-provincial character. Examples of employment falling within federal jurisdiction include navigation and shipping, air transportation, railways and other inter-provincial connections, road transportation, banks, specified products such as grain and uranium, telecommunications, federal employees, and First Nations (aboriginal/Indigenous) activity. As a result, most employers that operate in multiple Canadian provinces are required to comply with a range of legislation in each of these provinces. For the most part, despite some significant differences, there is reasonable consistency in the legal principles that apply to employment and labour law in all Canadian jurisdictions, including Québec.
New Developments
Many provincial governments continue to legislate increases in employee entitlements and protections. A number of the country’s provinces, including Ontario, Quebec, Manitoba, and British Columbia, have all either already increased their minimum wage rates in 2026 or are scheduled to do so late in the year. Certain jurisdictions are legislating or announcing an intention to legislate employer obligations on a variety of fronts, including with respect to job postings and pay transparency (Ontario), preventing sexual violence and psychological harassment in the workplace (Quebec), and increasing statutory minimum notice periods for without-cause dismissals (federally regulated employers).
Significant changes to pay transparency obligations continue. For example, this year in Ontario amendments were enacted related to job postings for employers with 25 or more employees such that those employers are now required to include expected compensation or the range of compensation in job postings. The province of British Columbia is also continuing its rollout of pay transparency legislation, with new reporting obligations beginning in 2026.
Greater awareness of social issues such as harassment (including sexual harassment), anti-Black racism and non-visible disabilities continues to change the landscape of employment law in Canada. Although Canadian jurisdictions have long had laws pertaining to discrimination and harassment, the number of claims now being made has increased significantly. This trend has led to a number of legal proceedings, including large class action lawsuits. Further, the continued trend toward workplace harassment legislation has dramatically increased the number of claims and investigations. Given that these claims are based on relatively new, untested legislation, the standards of conduct are still being developed by the litigation process, resulting in not only meritorious claims coming forward, but also a distinct trend of employees claiming harassment over what have traditionally been seen as normal management techniques and disciplinary measures, or simply in response to any critique of their work performance.
Finally, like many other developed countries, a large portion of Canada’s workforce is reaching the age where people have traditionally chosen to retire. For a variety of reasons, many Canadians are opting to continue to work longer, creating new and complex issues for employers. These issues include structuring retirement packages, as well as terminating the employment of someone who is older, and consequently may have decades of tenure. Not only are the costs of terminating long service employees much higher, but it also often becomes a delicate balancing act when an employee’s age begins to affect their work, and the statutory prohibitions against age discrimination may then trigger accommodation requirements akin to those for employees with disabilities.