international employment law firm alliance L&E Global
|
Employment Law Overview Luxembourg
1. Labour and Employment Law Requirements
1. Legal Framework Differentiating Employees From Independent Contractors
1. Legal Framework Differentiating Employees from Independent Contractors
1. Legal Framework Differentiating Employees From Independent Contractors
1. Legal Framework Differentiating Employees From Independent Contractors
1. Legal Framework Differentiating Employees From Independent Contractors
1. Legal Framework Differentiating Employees From Independent Contractors
1. Legal Framework Differentiating Employees from Independent Contractors
1. Legal Framework Differentiating Employees from Independent Contractors
1. Legal Framework Differentiating Employees from Independent Contractors
1. Legal Framework Differentiating Employees from Independent Contractors
1. Legal Framework Differentiating Employees from Independent Contractors
1. Legal Framework Differentiating Employees From Independent Contractors
1. Legal Framework Differentiating Employees From Independent Contractors
1. Legal Framework Differentiating Employees from Independent Contractors
1. Legal Framework Differentiating Employees From Independent Contractors
1. Legal Framework Differentiating Employees From Independent Contractors
1. Legal Framework Differentiating Employees From Independent Contractors
1. Legal Framework Differentiating Employees from Independent Contractors
1. Legal Framework Differentiating Employees from Independent Contractors
1. Re-Characterisation of Independent Contractors as Employees
1. Re-Characterisation of Independent Contractors as Employees
2. Corporate Law Requirements
2. How to Structure an Independent Contractor Relationship
2. How to Structure an Independent Contractor Relationship
2. Re-Characterisation of Independent Contractors as Employees
2. Re-Characterisation of Independent Contractors as Employees
2. Re-Characterisation of Independent Contractors as Employees
2. Re-Characterisation of Independent Contractors as Employees
2. Re-Characterisation of Independent Contractors as Employees
2. Re-Characterisation of Independent Contractors as Employees
2. Re-Characterisation of Independent Contractors as Employees
2. Re-Characterisation of Independent Contractors as Employees
2. Re-Characterisation of Independent Contractors as Employees
2. Re-Characterisation of Independent Contractors as Employees
2. Re-Characterisation of Independent Contractors as Employees
2. Re-Characterisation of Independent Contractors as Employees
2. Re-Characterisation of Independent Contractors as Employees
2. Re-Characterisation of Independent Contractors as Employees
2. Re-Characterisation of Independent Contractors as Employees
2. Re-Characterisation of Independent Contractors as Employees
2. Re-Characterisation of Independent Contractors as Employees
2. Re-Characterisation of Independent Contractors as Employees
2. Re-Characterisation of Independent Contractors as Employees
3. Business Presence Issues
3. How to Structure an Independent Contractor Relationship
3. How to Structure an Independent Contractor Relationship
3. How to Structure an Independent Contractor Relationship
3. How to Structure an Independent Contractor Relationship
3. How to Structure an Independent Contractor Relationship
3. How to Structure an Independent Contractor Relationship
3. How to Structure an Independent Contractor Relationship
3. How to Structure an Independent Contractor Relationship
3. How to Structure an Independent Contractor Relationship
3. How to Structure an Independent Contractor Relationship
3. How to Structure an Independent Contractor Relationship
3. How to Structure an Independent Contractor Relationship
3. How to Structure an Independent Contractor Relationship
3. How to Structure an Independent Contractor Relationship
3. How to Structure an Independent Contractor Relationship
3. How to Structure an Independent Contractor Relationship
3. How to Structure an Independent Contractor Relationship
3. How to Structure an Independent Contractor Relationship
3. Payroll and Benefits Providers
3. Trends and Specific Cases
4. Conclusion
4. Legal Framework Differentiating Employees from Independent Contractors
4. Trends and Specific Cases
4. Trends and Specific Cases
4. Trends and Specific Cases
4. Trends and Specific Cases
4. Trends and Specific Cases
4. Trends and Specific Cases
4. Trends and Specific Cases
4. Trends and Specific Cases
4. Trends and Specific Cases
4. Trends and Specific Cases
4. Trends and Specific Cases
4. Trends and Specific Cases
4. Trends and Specific Cases
4. Trends and Specific Cases
4. Trends and Specific Cases
4. Trends and Specific Cases
4. Trends and Specific Cases
4. Trends and Specific Cases
4. Trends and Specific Cases
5. Business Presence Issues
5. Business Presence Issues
5. Business Presence Issues
5. Business Presence Issues
5. Business Presence Issues
5. Business Presence Issues
5. Business Presence Issues
5. Business Presence Issues
5. Business Presence Issues
5. Conclusion
5. Conclusion
5. Conclusion
5. Conclusion
5. Conclusion
5. Conclusion
5. Conclusion
5. Conclusion
5. Conclusion
5. Conclusion
5. Conclusion
6. Conclusion
6. Conclusion
6. Conclusion
6. Conclusion
6. Conclusion
6. Conclusion
6. Conclusion
6. Conclusion
6. How to Structure an Independent Contractor Relationship in Brazil
About L&E Global
Asia Pacific focus group
Austria
Contact
Countries
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs Argentina
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs Australia
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs Belgium
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs Brazil
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs Canada
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs Chile
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs China
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs Colombia
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs Czech Republic
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs France
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs Germany
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs India
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs Ireland
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs Italy
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs Japan
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs Luxembourg
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs Mexico
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs Netherlands
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs Norway
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs Peru
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs Poland
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs Romania
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs Singapore
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs Spain
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs Sweden
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs Switzerland
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs United Kingdom
Cross-Border Remote Work FAQs USA
Disclaimer
Employees vs Independent Contractors
Employees vs Independent Contractors Argentina
Employees vs Independent Contractors Australia
Employees vs Independent Contractors Belgium
Employees vs Independent Contractors Brazil
Employees vs Independent Contractors Canada
Employees vs Independent Contractors China
Employees vs Independent Contractors France
Employees vs Independent Contractors Germany
Employees vs Independent Contractors India
Employees vs Independent Contractors Mexico
Employees vs Independent Contractors Netherlands
Employees vs Independent Contractors Norway
Employees vs Independent Contractors Poland
Employees vs Independent Contractors Romania
Employees vs Independent Contractors Singapore
Employees vs Independent Contractors Spain
Employees vs Independent Contractors Sweden
Employees vs Independent Contractors Switzerland
Employees vs Independent Contractors United Kingdom
Employees vs Independent Contractors USA
Employment law firm Argentina
Employment law firm Australia
Employment law firm Belgium
Employment law firm Brazil
Employment law firm Canada
Employment law firm Chile
Employment law firm China
Employment law firm Colombia
Employment law firm Czech Republic
Employment law firm Dominican Republic
Employment law firm France
Employment law firm Germany
Employment law firm India
Employment law firm Ireland
Employment law firm Italy
Employment law firm Japan
Employment law firm Luxembourg
Employment law firm Mexico
Employment law firm Norway
Employment law firm Peru
Employment law firm Philippines
Employment law firm Poland
Employment law firm Romania
Employment law firm Singapore
Employment law firm Slovakia
Employment law firm Spain
Employment law firm Sweden
Employment law firm Switzerland
Employment law firm Taiwan
Employment law firm the Netherlands
Employment law firm Türkiye
Employment law firm UK
Employment law firm USA
Employment Law Overviews
EU focus group
Global Leadership
HR Legal Counsel
International Employment Contracts
Knowledge
L&E Compare!
L&E Global
Latin America focus group
Legal Support for Human Resource departments
News
newsletter
Portugal
Privacy policy & Cookies policy
Quality Committee
Sitemap
Starting a business in Argentina
Starting a business in Australia
Starting a business in Belgium
Starting a business in Brazil
Starting a business in Canada
Starting a business in Chile
Starting a business in China
Starting a business in Colombia
Starting a business in Czech Republic
Starting a business in France
Starting a business in Germany
Starting a business in India
Starting a business in Ireland
Starting a business in Italy
Starting a business in Japan
Starting a business in Luxembourg
Starting a business in Mexico
Starting a business in Norway
Starting a business in Peru
Starting a business in Poland
Starting a business in Romania
Starting a business in Singapore
Starting a business in Spain
Starting a business in Sweden
Starting a business in Switzerland
Starting a business in the Netherlands
Starting a business in the UK
Starting a business in the USA
Starting a business in Türkiye
Starting a Business in...
Subscribe to Receive Our Monthly Updates
Thank you for contacting us
Thank you for subscribing
中文
日本語

Employment Law Overview Luxembourg

Introduction

In Luxembourg, the labour market is characterised by the number of commuters from France, Belgium and Germany, which represents almost 50% of the labour force. In Luxembourg, the social peace is of utmost importance and usually secured by regular dialogue between social partners. Due to the recent codification of employment laws and with recent employment laws voted during the past few years, the Luxembourg labour code is increasing in volume. For example, we can highlight:

  • the simplification act dated 23 July 2015 reforming the staff representatives in Luxembourg.
  • the law of 8 April 2018 which made numerous amendments to the Labour Code, in particular to better protect employees’ rights and improve the effectiveness of employment measures.
  • the law of 10 August 2018 relating to the benefits employees are entitled to in case of incapacity to work.
  • the entry into force of the GDPR and its impact on monitoring employees.

Key Points

  • The Labour Code came into effect on 1 September 2006 and groups all existing employment rules.
  • Termination of contracts is strictly regulated by the Labour Code with specified notice periods depending on the length of service with the same employer.
  • Right of workers to strike is implicitly guaranteed by the Constitution under the freedom of association, but is only possible under specific circumstances. A peace obligation exists in the frame of a collective labour agreement. Moreover, in order to be legal, every strike or lockout movement must first be referred to the National Office of Conciliation (ONC).
  • Key institutions include the Labour Ministry, the National Employment Administration (Administration pour le développement de l’emploi) which, notably, is in charge of assisting unemployed persons and the Labour and Mines Inspectorate (Inspection du Travail et des Mines), which is responsible for controlling standards of health and safety at work, compliance with employment legislation and supervising working conditions.

Luxembourg employment law is based on EU regulations, the Labour Code, case law, collective bargaining agreements, Grand-Ducal regulations and certain employers’ practices. The Labour Code came into effect on 1 September 2006 and is constantly updated. It combines all employment rules into one document that citizens can easily access. The Labour Code is divided into six parts:

  • individual and collective employment relations;
  • regulation of employment and working conditions;
  • protection, safety and health of employees;
  • staff representation;
  • employment and unemployment benefits; and
  • administration and other structures.

With the entry into force on 1 January 2009 of the law of 13 May 2008 on the Single Statute for employees of the private sector, the Labour Code is applicable to all employees within the private sector.

Under Luxembourg law, the relationship between employer and employee is, in principle, an individual one. The employment contract defines the terms and conditions existing in the employer-employee relationship. The employment contract can add advantageous conditions to the employee, but cannot establish exceptions to the minimum statutory requirements that are disadvantageous to the employee.

An employment contract is defined by case law as an agreement, whereby a person is providing his/her work to another person, under the subordination of whom he/she is placed in return for remuneration. A contract of employment is thus comprised of a provision of work, remuneration and a position of subordination.

Collective bargaining agreements may be concluded with trade unions and may modify some legal rules, terms and conditions of employment. A collective bargaining agreement is defined by the Labour Code as a contract covering reciprocal relationships and general conditions of employment, concluded on the one hand, between one or more representative trade union organisations and a single company or group of companies in the same line of business, or all the enterprises in the same trade or industry, on the other.

A Grand-Ducal regulation may declare such collective agreements as generally binding all parties (employees and employers) concerned. Grand-Ducal regulations also complete employment laws.

The individual disputes between employers and employees about contracts of employment are resolved before the Labour Court in first instance (Tribunal du travail). The Court of Appeal (Cour d’appel) has the jurisdiction for judgments on appeal. The case may eventually be referred to the Supreme Court (Cour de cassation), but only on questions of law.

Legilux (www.legilux.lu) is the legal portal of the Government of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg including all published legislation.

New Developments

The law of 8 April 2018 made numerous amendments to the Labour Code in order to improve the protection of the rights of employees, the effectiveness of employment measures and in particular:

  • to provide a more precise definition of the elements to be taken into account when determining the salary in the event of sick leave;
  • increase the weekly working time for students from 10 to 15 hours outside of school holidays;
  • adapt the labour legislation concerning the resignation of the employee due to gross misconduct of the employer;
  • amend the legal provisions applicable in case a settlement agreement is signed between the employer and the employee during a judicial procedure; and
  • amend the measures concerning re-employment assistance.

The law of 10 August 2018 relating to the benefits employees are entitled to in case of incapacity to work, which was published on 21 August 2018, provides in particular that, starting 1 January 2019, employees have the right to claim their benefits for 78 weeks of sickness, compared to 52 weeks until the end of 2018, during a reference period of 104 weeks. The employment contract will thus automatically expire by law after 78 weeks of sickness (compared to 52 weeks previously).

Of course, the Covid-19 crisis has brought important temporary amendments to labour and social security law during 2020, regarding a range of aspects such as health and safety, sickness, work time of health professionals, cross-border workers, teleworking, unemployment, short-time working, dismissals, etc.

Any questions

Ask our member firm in